Breakenridge: Supreme Courtroom ruling provides renewed objective to UCP's battle in opposition to feds

Article content material

Regardless of the courageous faces from the prime minister and his cupboard, there’s no escaping the truth that the Supreme Courtroom’s choice discovering the Affect Evaluation Act to be unconstitutional was a pointy rebuke and a serious defeat.

Conversely, the choice is a big win for Alberta and a transparent validation of the argument in opposition to federal overreach that prompted the authorized problem within the first place.

Article content material

Article content material

As such, there’s been nothing insincere concerning the elation right here in Alberta, and we’ve seen a quite prolonged and exuberant victory lap from the premier for the reason that ruling. That’s to be anticipated — it’s not simply the overcome the much-maligned Affect Evaluation Act, but additionally the chance that this bodes nicely for difficult Ottawa’s Clear Vitality Rules and different meddlesome insurance policies.

It’s notable that the premier who set all of this in movement didn’t final lengthy sufficient to see it come to fruition. Whichever of the 2 principal leaders prevailed in Alberta’s most up-to-date provincial election was going to be within the lucky place of getting this courtroom choice land in her lap.

However right here’s the ironic twist: had it been as much as both of these leaders, there can be nothing to rejoice. There would have been no courtroom problem and, due to this fact, no victory. They’re definitely welcome to benefit from the result, however they shouldn’t get a cross on this disapproval of the successful technique.

As premier, NDP Chief Rachel Notley was vital of what was, on the time, Invoice C-69. It’s truthful to say, although, that had she been re-elected within the 2019 election, she wouldn’t have taken the battle to the courts. The NDP considered Jason Kenney’s courtroom battles as unnecessarily antagonistic, to not point out a waste of time and sources. They have been specific with such allegations when the Kenney authorities misplaced its constitutional problem of the federal carbon levy.

Article content material

Article content material

Oddly sufficient, present UCP Chief Danielle Smith additionally considered these courtroom challenges as a waste of time and sources. In contrast to Notley, nonetheless, Smith considered this strategy as not almost antagonistic sufficient.

This morphed into one of many chief (non-COVID-related) arguments from the UCP’s proper in opposition to Kenney’s management: that regardless of his rhetoric within the 2019 election about standing as much as Ottawa, he merely wasn’t robust sufficient.

Smith herself articulated this viewpoint when, throughout her management marketing campaign, she unveiled her proposed Alberta Sovereignty Act. The act, she mentioned, can be a brand new and efficient technique of coping with federal overreach, versus the 2 failed previous approaches.

The “NDP strategy,” she argued, concerned merely following together with Ottawa’s plans. The “institution UCP strategy” was nothing greater than offended letters and extended and pointless courtroom challenges. Her most well-liked possibility was to someway stop federal coverage from making use of in Alberta to start with.

As we all know, regardless of the passage of a model of the Sovereignty Act, there is no such thing as a federal coverage that has been rendered null and void in Alberta, nor does there appear to be a lot perception anymore that such a factor is even doable.

Article content material

So now there’s objective and worth in combating the federal authorities in courtroom and making certain that Ottawa, as the present premier put it, stays in its lane. However that was true all alongside.

Kenney might have overpromised and underdelivered when it got here to combating Ottawa. Nonetheless, Kenney no less than understood that there was a mechanism for holding Ottawa to account and was ready to utilize that.

Albertans’ fondness for the courts and the Structure might now be at considerably elevated ranges, however the cynical view that we needn’t even trouble pleading our case positively undermined public confidence in these establishments.

As we are able to see now, it’s additionally an strategy that might have harmed Alberta’s pursuits.

“Afternoons with Rob Breakenridge” airs weekdays from 12:30 to three p.m. on QR Calgary

[email protected]

Twitter: @RobBreakenridge

Article content material