Opinion: Cherry-picking stats does a disservice to colleges and college students

Article content material

Cherry-picking in analysis means selecting knowledge that helps your argument whereas ignoring different knowledge that disproves your level. In an Aug. 8 opinion column, the Cardus think-tank writers have picked sufficient cherries to make themselves an entire pie. 

I’ll ignore the callous use of the phrases “good faculties” and “dangerous faculties,” as these reveal both a shallow understanding of training or a heartbreaking disregard for college kids. As an alternative, let’s start with the column’s use of provincial achievement checks as a measure of every college’s work.

Article content material

Buckets of analysis way back to the Sixties have decried the usage of standardized testing as socioeconomically biased and due to this fact not a dependable measure of a scholar’s studying. Utilizing standardized take a look at outcomes to base an argument for impartial faculties is shaky at greatest. Achievement checks are one slice of a kid’s studying at one cut-off date. They aren’t an entire or arguably correct measure of studying.

That two faculties with totally different socioeconomic backgrounds have totally different outcomes is not a startling revelation nevertheless it is an incredible cherry to select and one which wraps opinions within the guise of authority. 

Right here’s some data that the provincial achievement scores don’t present and wasn’t talked about. Colleges that work with youngsters who don’t communicate English, and who might have skilled battle, poverty and starvation, assist rework these youngsters. I’ve seen these so-called “dangerous” faculties assist youngsters turn into fluent in English. I’ve seen these faculties welcome youngsters who’ve by no means held a pencil, who alternate college with siblings so they may have meals of their lunches, and switch them into learners. These will not be “dangerous” faculties. In actual fact, they’re nice faculties. Really understanding what is occurring in these faculties requires the components of significant analysis — richer knowledge, reflection and deeper evaluation than a PAT consequence gives.

Article content material

One other piece of information not shared? There’s one pot of funding for Ok-12 training. The provincial authorities doesn’t add more cash when various faculties emerge; fairly every college will get rather less. Permitting extra funding for extra forms of education may sound nice in idea however there’s a horrible price. Whereas the opinion writers argue that “all faculties could be higher off if impartial faculties acquired public funds,” that merely isn’t true. What would occur is the very faculties that work so successfully and humanely could be confronted with bigger courses, fewer books and computer systems.

So, a few of these college students don’t do properly on their provincial achievement checks? In actual fact, they may in time, and so they do. Possibly not every year however, by the point they go away the general public college system, most do. You see, public training isn’t about how a toddler performs in a second in time. It’s about the entire little one over the house of 13 years.

The column additionally asserts {that a} “sturdy, totally funded impartial sector would spur failing faculties to enhance.” In the USA, the “no little one left behind” insurance policies operated underneath that very same false impression. In fact, it achieved the alternative. Colleges with high-needs college students had funding withdrawn, leaving faculties to do extra with even much less. It didn’t change who attended the faculties — it merely punished them additional for being in a poor space.

Public training is the inspiration of a wholesome democracy and disgrace on those that search to erode it. Disgrace on those that search to take extra funding away from faculties that achieve this a lot with college students who want it essentially the most. Disgrace on those that manipulate statistics for their very own acquire or that of their group.

The factor about this kind of cherry pie is that it’s really not good for you. Slice it open and see the pits hiding in all of that goo.

 Karen Pegler is a retired teacher-educational specialist with the CBE.